Over the last week or so the controversy in boxing has mainly focused on AIBA and the poor decisions that we've been seeing in the Rio Olympics. This past Friday however the controversy returned to the professional side of the sport with touted Kazakh Bakhtiyar Eyubov (11-0, 10) being the benefactor, as he took a controversial win over Karim Mayfield (19-4-1, 11).
Eyubov had entered the bout as the betting favourite, with some picking him as one of the best emerging punchers in the sport, and he had shown that power last time out against Jared Robinson. There was however a lot of unanswered questions about the Kazakh,such as “what happens when he faces someone who can take his power?” and “Can he fight for more than 3 rounds?”
Last night we saw both of those being answered, sort of, with neither answer being a good one for Eyubov.
From the early stages he was struggling with Mayfield's aggression and work rate. The America knew when to attack and when to hold and gave Eyubov no chance to settle into a rhythm. The Kazakh could well have been 4 rounds down as we entered in to round 5, and worryignly for Eyubov he had never previously been beyond 3 rounds,
The unbeaten man managed to find some momentum in the middle rounds, fighting his way in to the contest in rounds 5 and 6 however any momentum he seemed to be generating was lost in round 8, after he was out fought and later deducted a point for going low. Things went from bad to worse for Eyubov who looked like he had run out of ideas in round 9 before being out jabbed by Mayfield in round 10, whilst running very low on gas.
It seemed like a clear win for Mayfield, who had out skilled, out sped, out fought, out thought and out worked the Kazakh puncher, who had his moments. At the end however the judges shocked us all giving a split decision to a very, very fortunate Eyubov, who had done little to deserve the win.
News! We try and give you the most interesting news stories from the Asian boxing world!